On Legal Terms in GESL
Keywords:
Terminology, Terms of justice, GESLAbstract
Georgian Sign Language (GESL) is facing great challenges with regard to terms. For the Deaf community formed under the Soviet reality, it was clearly not necessary to use most legal terms for a number of political and socio-economic reasons. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the languages of the Deaf communities went through reintegration processes following the reintegration of the countries, former republics, and the new reality has given rise to new needs. One such need is to solve terminology issues in the sign languages.
It can be said that there is, in fact, a complete lacuna in this area of GESL. There is no scientific or methodological literature on the production of terms in this sign language, although relevant European and American experiences can be shared.
This article discusses how legal terms in GESL are created in Georgia and what types of challenges and problems arise during this process. It also discusses the conceptual processes behind sign-term creation. Three types of term production are described and appropriate examples provided.
References
მახარობლიძე 2019 – თამარ მახარობლიძე, ქართული ჟესტური ენის ზმნის მორფოლოგია, ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, შოთა რუსთაველის ეროვნული სამეცნიერო ფონდი, თბილისი.
მახარობლიძე 2018 – თამარ მახარობლიძე, ლინგვისტური წერილები – IV წიგნის ფაბრიკა, თბილისი.
მახარობლიძე 2015 – თამარ მახარობლიძე, ქართული ჟესტურის ენის ლექსიკონი, ილიას სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, შოთა რუსთაველის ეროვნული სამეცნიერო ფონდი, თბილისი.
მახარობლიძე 2012 – თამარ მახარობლიძე, ქართული ჟესტური ენა, საქართველოს განათლებისა და მეცნიერების სამინისტრო, USIAD, Save The Children International, თბილისი.
Aronoff, Meir, Sandler 2005 – Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir and Wendy Sandler, The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology, Journal of Linguistic Society of America.
Bahan 1996 – Benjamin Bahan, Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language, PHD dissertation, Boston University.
Baker-Shenk and others, 1991 – Baker-Shenk, Charlotte & Cokely, Dennis, American Sign Language, A Teacher’s Resource Text of Grammar and Culture, Clerc Books, Gallaudet University Press, Washington D.C.
Brentari (2010) – Diane Brentari, Sign Languages, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Emmorey and others 1995 – Emmorey, Karen & Reilly, Judy, Language, Gesture, and Space, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
Kendon 1994 – Adam Kendon, "Human Gestures" In: K.R. Gibson and T. Ingold (ed.) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Liddell 2003 – Liddell, Scott, Grammar Gesture and meaning in American Sign Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillo-Martin 1986 – Diane Lillo-Martin, Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4.
Meier Richard P. 1982 – Richard P. Meier, Icons analogues and morphemes: The acquisition of verb agreement in American Sign Language, PHD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Meir, Padden 2006 – Irit Meir, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler, Rethinking sign language verb classes: The body as subject. Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Padden 1983 – Carol Padden, Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. PHD dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
Perniss 2007 – Pamela Perniss, Space and Iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). PHD dissertation, MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 45, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Pfau 2012 – Ronald Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of linguistics and communication science). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandler and others 2006 – Wendy Sandler & Diane Lillo-Martin, Sign language and linguistic universals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robin, Karen, Robert 2006 – Thompson Robin, Emmorey Karen & Kluender Robert, The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye tracking study. Natural language and Linguistic theory.